Should I Sue?

As the statistics show, very few cases of sexual assault are reported to the police. Whether or not criminal charges have been brought against the abuser, a survivor of sexual assault is entitled to sue their attacker and anyone who may have been in a position to stop or prevent the abuse. Many survivors find that bringing a civil lawsuit forms part of a constructive healing process. They find it empowering; it allows them to take control over their future. It can be a means to obtain funds for therapy, education, or other improvements in their lives.

Unlike criminal proceedings, where a survivor is merely a witness for the crown and has no control over the process, in a civil case the survivor/plaintiff has a great deal of control over how the case is conducted. It is important to seek legal advice from a lawyer who has experience with such cases.

Date

Type

Title

Related People

Related Services

May 2021

Presentation

Practicing in the Pandemic: The New Normal

OTLA Spring Conference

Loretta P. Merritt

April 2021

Presentation

Making the Most of Expert Evidence

OTLA Webinar

Loretta P. Merritt

March 2021

Article

Economic Losses in Civil Sexual Assault Cases

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

February 2021

Presentation

Civil Sexual Assault: Critical and Emerging Issues

Osgoode Professional Development

Loretta P. Merritt

February 2021

Presentation

Mentoring

Torkin Manes

Loretta P. Merritt

February 2021

Presentation

Compensation and Financial Management

Torkin Manes - Justicia Committee

Loretta P. Merritt

January 2021

Presentation

Imposter Syndrome

Torkin Manes - Justicia Committee

Loretta P. Merritt

December 2020

Presentation

Financial Management of Your Practice

Torkin Manes

Loretta P. Merritt

December 2020

Article

Publication Bans: Do They Help or Hurt Abuse Survivors?

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

December 2020

Presentation

Litigating Class Actions Claims Amidst Profound Change

12th Annual Class Actions Colloquium presented by the Canadian Bar Association

Loretta P. Merritt

October 2020

Presentation

Sexual Abuse: Developing a Claim for Vicarious Liability

OTLA 2020 Fall Conference

Loretta P. Merritt

July 2020

Presentation

Civil Sexual Assault - Practical Considerations - Civil litigation and other options beyond criminal charges

OTLA Webinar

Loretta P. Merritt

July 2020

Article

School Board Liability for Sexual Assaults by Teacher

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

May 2020

Presentation

Girao v. Cunningham: Latest Word on Trial Evidence by the Ontario Court of Appeal

Torkin Manes

Loretta P. Merritt

May 2020

Presentation

Sexual Assault: Credibility and Memory Issues

OTLA Webinar

Loretta P. Merritt

April 2020

Article

The problems with class actions for historical sexual abuse cases

 The Lawyer’s Daily

Loretta P. Merritt

December 2019

Article

Busting Sexual Assault Myths (Still)

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

May 2019

Article

Nude Video Chats Are Voyeurism

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

April 2019

Article

What Does #MeToo Mean for Lawyers?

OTLA - The Litigator magazine

Loretta P. Merritt

February 2019

Presentation

Credibility and Memory Issues in Sexual Assault Cases

Co-Chair - Sexual Misconduct in the #Metoo Era, Osgoode Hall Law School

Loretta P. Merritt

January 2019

Article

Ontario Government Auto Insurance Reform

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

October 2018

Article

Problems with Class Actions for Historical Sexual Abuse Cases

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

October 2018

Presentation

The Prudent Parent: Holding School Boards Liable

OTLA 2018 Fall Conference

Loretta P. Merritt

March 2018

Presentation

Pursuing Compensation for Victims of Crime: Civil Lawsuits

Office for Victims of Crime

Loretta P. Merritt

March 2018

Article

When Should the Survivor of a Sexual Assault Seek the Advice of a Civil Lawyer?

Torkin Manes LegalPoint

Loretta P. Merritt

Items 1 to 25 of 81

Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims struggling with the class-action process and outcome

by User Not Found | Aug 04, 2020
Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims from the Huronia Regional Centre struggling with the class-action process and outcome.

Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims from the Huronia Regional Centre struggling with the class-action process and outcome.


 

Marie Slark was hopeful when former residents of the Huronia Regional Centre (HRC) came together in a class-action to sue the province for forcing them to linger for years in an abusive and toxic environment.

She was taken to the former Orillia facility for people with developmental disabilities when she was seven years old, enduring all sorts of abuses until she was let out at age 20. 

Maybe, she thought hopefully when the $2-billion claim was launched, she could buy her own home.

But in the end, the case was settled for $35 million. And for years of physical, sexual and emotional abuse, the maximum former residents could receive was $42,000.

“It wasn’t really worth going to court for,” said Slark, now 64 and living independently in an apartment in Toronto. “Those who don’t speak only got $2,000” no matter how long they lived at the Orillia facility or what they endured.

If she and other people who knew them hadn’t spoken out for them, her brother, Tommy, and sister, Karen, would have received nothing more than the $2,000 minimum, she added.

The class size was estimated by the court to be 4,308 people who were still alive in 2013. But the exact number was never fully determined.

In the end, 1,705 claims were accepted.

When Toronto lawyer Loretta Merritt argues passionately that individual lawsuits are often a better approach for victims of historic institutional abuse, particularly those involving sexual abuse, than class actions, she points to the HRC case, along with a series of other settlements in Ontario, including several institutions in Simcoe County, which are now all closed.

“I think an individual action is a good idea a lot of the time,” said Merritt.

An individual plaintiff is in the driver’s seat, directing its course. So they, not the lawyers, decide whether to settle or not, she said. 

Merritt adds that they have the opportunity to have their own individual story told and they can customize the settlement for their own individual needs.

But a big part of her argument is the financial outcome.

Class-actions can be to the defendant’s advantage, allowing them to pay “pennies on the dollar” for those who come forward and collect damages under the class proceeding, she said. They could also get back any settlement fund money that isn’t paid out. 

And any abuse survivors who don’t come forward to collect their money under the class-action and haven’t already opted out, no longer have a chance to claim anything. The class-action extinguishes future claims whether victims are aware of the class-action or not.

“They can get a whole lot more money” through individual lawsuits, she said. “I’m talking many multiples” of what class members have been getting in Ontario.

She points to settlement decisions in several local historic institutional abuse cases involving thousands of victims:

  • The court approved a final settlement for former HRC residents in December 2013 for $35 million. The lawyers’ cut was $8.5 million, according to Merritt’s analysis.
  • The Sheila Morrison School for learning disabilities in Utopia, which is between Barrie and Angus, resulted in a $4-million court-approved settlement in March 2013. Class members received a maximum of $50,000. Merrit found that the lawyers were paid $1.1 million.
  • In another class-action involving several institutions across the province, residents of the former Edgar Adult Occupational Centre near Horseshoe Valley received a maximum of $42,000. The total settlement approved by the court in April 2016 for residents at Edgar, Muskoka Centre and several other institutions was nearly $36 million. The lawyers received $3.7 million.

To read the full article, please visit CollingwoodToday.

Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims struggling with the class-action process and outcome

by User Not Found | Aug 04, 2020
Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims from the Huronia Regional Centre struggling with the class-action process and outcome.

Loretta P. Merritt spoke to Collingwood Today on abuse victims from the Huronia Regional Centre struggling with the class-action process and outcome.


 

Marie Slark was hopeful when former residents of the Huronia Regional Centre (HRC) came together in a class-action to sue the province for forcing them to linger for years in an abusive and toxic environment.

She was taken to the former Orillia facility for people with developmental disabilities when she was seven years old, enduring all sorts of abuses until she was let out at age 20. 

Maybe, she thought hopefully when the $2-billion claim was launched, she could buy her own home.

But in the end, the case was settled for $35 million. And for years of physical, sexual and emotional abuse, the maximum former residents could receive was $42,000.

“It wasn’t really worth going to court for,” said Slark, now 64 and living independently in an apartment in Toronto. “Those who don’t speak only got $2,000” no matter how long they lived at the Orillia facility or what they endured.

If she and other people who knew them hadn’t spoken out for them, her brother, Tommy, and sister, Karen, would have received nothing more than the $2,000 minimum, she added.

The class size was estimated by the court to be 4,308 people who were still alive in 2013. But the exact number was never fully determined.

In the end, 1,705 claims were accepted.

When Toronto lawyer Loretta Merritt argues passionately that individual lawsuits are often a better approach for victims of historic institutional abuse, particularly those involving sexual abuse, than class actions, she points to the HRC case, along with a series of other settlements in Ontario, including several institutions in Simcoe County, which are now all closed.

“I think an individual action is a good idea a lot of the time,” said Merritt.

An individual plaintiff is in the driver’s seat, directing its course. So they, not the lawyers, decide whether to settle or not, she said. 

Merritt adds that they have the opportunity to have their own individual story told and they can customize the settlement for their own individual needs.

But a big part of her argument is the financial outcome.

Class-actions can be to the defendant’s advantage, allowing them to pay “pennies on the dollar” for those who come forward and collect damages under the class proceeding, she said. They could also get back any settlement fund money that isn’t paid out. 

And any abuse survivors who don’t come forward to collect their money under the class-action and haven’t already opted out, no longer have a chance to claim anything. The class-action extinguishes future claims whether victims are aware of the class-action or not.

“They can get a whole lot more money” through individual lawsuits, she said. “I’m talking many multiples” of what class members have been getting in Ontario.

She points to settlement decisions in several local historic institutional abuse cases involving thousands of victims:

  • The court approved a final settlement for former HRC residents in December 2013 for $35 million. The lawyers’ cut was $8.5 million, according to Merritt’s analysis.
  • The Sheila Morrison School for learning disabilities in Utopia, which is between Barrie and Angus, resulted in a $4-million court-approved settlement in March 2013. Class members received a maximum of $50,000. Merrit found that the lawyers were paid $1.1 million.
  • In another class-action involving several institutions across the province, residents of the former Edgar Adult Occupational Centre near Horseshoe Valley received a maximum of $42,000. The total settlement approved by the court in April 2016 for residents at Edgar, Muskoka Centre and several other institutions was nearly $36 million. The lawyers received $3.7 million.

To read the full article, please visit CollingwoodToday.